Postgraduate Course: Health Systems: Strengthening and Reform (PGSP11364)
|School||School of Social and Political Science
||College||College of Humanities and Social Science
||Availability||Available to all students
|Credit level (Normal year taken)||SCQF Level 11 (Postgraduate)
|Home subject area||Postgrad (School of Social and Political Studies)
||Other subject area||None
||Taught in Gaelic?||No
|Course description||This course examines health systems strengthening and reform initiatives in developed and developing countries, providing the knowledge and skills required to evaluate health sector policies with respect to their consequences for goals such as equity, efficiency and quality.
In many developed countries, there is a shift away from unified public financing and delivery of health care towards private finance and governance through competitive markets. Processes of privatisation and marketisation are increasingly widespread, as policy-makers aim to reduce health care costs (particularly those borne by the state) while maintaining or improving the standards of care. Such reform programmes have been given new impetus as governments reduce the size and cost of the public sector in response to the economic crisis. They involve the private sector directly in resource allocation decisions, and can have a major impact on the efficiency, accessibility and quality of health care services provided.
However, this course examines a broader range of reform programmes. Taking place alongside market-oriented programmes in high-income countries are reforms in the developing world that reverse a generational trend of state retrenchment, and are focused directly on broadening access to financial protection and to needed care. The move towards strengthening primary care provision is an important case study in this context. We also consider initiatives at the global level, many of which aim to address significant disease burdens through expanding the influence of commercial and civil society actors in health systems. Partnerships such as the Global Fund against AIDS, Tuberculosis & Malaria and the Global Alliance for Vaccines & Immunisation provide a focus for empirical evaluation here.
Entry Requirements (not applicable to Visiting Students)
||Other requirements|| None
|Additional Costs|| None
Information for Visiting Students
|Displayed in Visiting Students Prospectus?||No
Course Delivery Information
|Delivery period: 2013/14 Semester 2, Available to all students (SV1)
||Learn enabled: Yes
|Course Start Date
|Breakdown of Learning and Teaching activities (Further Info)
Lecture Hours 10,
Seminar/Tutorial Hours 10,
Programme Level Learning and Teaching Hours 4,
Directed Learning and Independent Learning Hours
|Breakdown of Assessment Methods (Further Info)
|No Exam Information
Summary of Intended Learning Outcomes
|- A critical understanding of the recent history of reform, in particular the role of the World Bank and IMF in processes of fiscal consolidation and structural adjustment.
- An ability to evaluate critically the ability of user fee-reduction and/or elimination programmes to provide financial protection and equitable access to health care.
- An ability to evaluate critically the impact of Global Health Initiatives on the capacity of health systems to address public health need and address health inequalities.
- A critical understanding of the role of innovative financing mechanisms in addressing disease burdens, and the impact of such mechanisms on wider strengthening efforts.
- An ability to evaluate critically reforms in high- and middle-income economies without universal health systems to expand financial protection and improve access.
- A critical understanding of the role of the private sector in the delivery of health care services, via contracts with state purchasers and through public-private partnerships.
|Assessment will be based on two components: |
1) Input to online discussion fora. Students to submit a portfolio of contributions to course discussions, comprising three short written reflections on readings and three examples of engagement in online discussions (30%)
2) Written essay of 3,000 words (70%).
||1. Global trends in health systems reform
2. Fiscal consolidation, structural adjustment and health expenditure
3. Financial protection and equitable access: China's Universal Health Care Plan
4. Global Health Initiatives, vertical programmes and health systems strengthening
5. Innovative financing mechanism: what works?
6. Strengthening primary health care: Family Health in Brazil
7. Reform in collection and pooling: the US Affordable Care Act
8. Privatisation and competition in health services
9. Contracting for health care in low- and middle-income countries
10. Public private partnerships for health care infrastructure and services
||- Saltman et al (Eds) (1998), Critical challenges for health care reform in Europe. Buckingham: Oxford University Press.
- Yip and Hsiao (2009), 'China's health care reform: A tentative assessment', China Economic Review, Vol. 20, pp. 613¿619.
- Macinko J, Guanais FC, de Fátima M, de Souza M. (2006), 'Evaluation of the impact of the Family Health Program on infant mortality in Brazil, 1990-2002', Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, Vol.60, pp. 13-19.
- Cutler (2002), 'Equality, efficiency, and market fundamentals: the dynamics of international medical care reform'. Journal of Economic Literature; 40: 881-906.
- Stuckler, Basu and McKee (2011). 'The International Monetary Fund and Aid Displacement', International Journal of Health Services, 41 (1), 67-76.
- Nabyonga Orem et al (2012), 'Abolition of user fees: the Uganda paradox', Health Policy and Planning, 26:ii41-ii51.
- Yates R. (2009), 'Universal health care and the removal of user fees'. Lancet, Vol. 373: pp. 2078-2081.
- Biesma R, Brugha R, Harmer A, Walsh A, Spicer N, Walt G (2009), 'The Effects of Global HIV/AIDS Initiatives on Country Health Systems: A Review of the Evidence', Health Policy and Planning, 24(4) 239-252.
- Hanson et al (2008), 'Is private health care the answer to the health problems of the world's poor?' PLoS Medicine, Vol.5 (11), pp. 1528-1532.
- Basu et al (2012), 'Comparative performance of Private and Public Healthcare Systems in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: a Systematic Review', PLoS Medicine, Vol.9 (6), online.
- Hollingsworth (2008), 'The measurement of efficiency and productivity of health care delivery'. Health Economics, Vol. 17: pp. 1107-1128.
- Sehkri, N., Feacham, R. and Ni, A. (2011). ¿Public-private integrated partnerships demonstrate the potential to improve health-care access, quality, and efficiency¿, Health Affairs, 30(8): 1498¿1507.
|Course organiser||Mr Mark Hellowell
Tel: (0131 6)51 1330
|Course secretary||Miss Jodie Fleming
Tel: (0131 6)51 5066
© Copyright 2013 The University of Edinburgh - 10 October 2013 5:09 am